The Reformers of St. Paul’s Evangelical, Brenham, Texas – Our Story to Disaffiliate from the ELCA

written by Dennis Nelson | November 7, 2024

Editor’s Note: Our prayers and words of thanks go to the Reformers group of St. Paul’s Lutheran Church.  They have been tireless in their efforts and courageous and faithful in their witness.  

The “Reformers” are a group of members from St. Paul’s Evangelical Lutheran Church, Brenham, Texas,  who began to meet to discuss the need for more Biblical enrichment during services and the lack of engagement among members:  attendance being down; no adult or children’s Sunday School; financial struggles of the church; the lack of involvement by a broader group of members, primarily because of not being asked to serve in leadership roles like church council or key committees. Our concerned group sought the truth, transparency and a dialogue about our church’s and the ELCA’s missions, impacts, and beliefs in the Holy Scripture.  Our group leaders met with our church council leaders first to discuss issues and then with the council, but our requests to bring these issues to the congregation were denied.  Without our leadership’s support, we petitioned, according to our constitution, to hold a congregational meeting to vote on a resolution to call a vote to terminate our affiliation with the ELCA. (This meeting must be called in order to have a discussion and inform the congregation of our findings.) The meeting date was determined by the council, and we had 27 days once notified to inform the congregation. We held four meetings and presented researched and referenced documentation, sent out mailers with documentation, and posted our full story and timeline on Facebook. (“The Reformers of St. Paul’s, Brenham”) Total votes cast were 393, with 158 for disaffiliation, 235 against disaffiliation, and 15 denied and given provisional ballots. In summation, 40% wanted to leave, but with 2/3 or 263 votes required for the first vote, the process ended. There were 677 confirmed members before. Latest numbers are unknown. Since the vote, the council sent members an email naming only singular nominees for important positions, and council adopted new resolutions for membership.

Following are actions of our synodical bishop, church council, and pastors to control the process and outcome:

  • Our pastors each preached sermons—despite not meeting with us to discuss issues first—about a group dividing the church and spreading rumors and lies.
  • Council and pastors stalled actions they were required to take according to our constitution.
  • We asked for a membership list at different times and received inaccurate and not up to date information. Members had been removed without following our constitution. New members were added. There were no membership processes or actions made known to the congregation.
  • We were told the “voting member” list would be used, despite the “voting member” list not being used previously for quorum at yearly congregational meetings. The church leadership determined the “voting member” list. We asked for the list, but were denied. Basically, it was a secret list seen only by ELCA church leadership.
  • Contrary to keeping the voting member list secret, the qualifying petition signed by members and presented to council was made available to members outside of the council. Petitioners were called or visited by leadership, retired St. Paul’s /ELCA pastors (7+ are members), and supporters to sway them.
  • The Interim Lead Pastor sent an email “Church Rumors and the Eighth Commandment” to the congregation. It contained partial truths and warned against “false and misleading” information.
  • The council denied our request to hold informational meetings on our own church property.  Many members did not want to be seen or were intimidated to not attend our meetings since we were denied access to church property despite being members.
  • Senior citizen members attending a “Game Day” fellowship event–elder members worship, communion, dominoes/cards, and dinner –were confused to believe if they voted for disaffiliation, they would no longer be members or be Lutheran, and would have to leave our church. 
  • The ELCA leadership did not allow comparisons to other Lutheran affiliations or an examination of the ELCA.
  • At the informational meeting with our synodical bishop, our questioning members were cut off, our information laughed at, and attendees commented “why don’t you just leave.” No attempt was made for this to be a fair discussion.

In summation, we were thwarted in our efforts to get accurate member information, and to give all members information needed to make an informed choice about the ELCA. The  ELCA leaders controlled the process and changed the rules as we went. Assumptions and accusations were spread about our group and documentation.

Concerning the work of the Commission for a Renewed Lutheran Church, our synodical bishop denied knowing of the existence of the DEIA audit and report until recently, and minimized the significance of the audit stating “And none of it’s going to be implemented at all.” He said it has nothing to do with the CRLC, even though the CRLC talks about it in written summaries of their meetings: Commission for a Renewed Lutheran Church – Evangelical Lutheran Church in America  All this was said in spite of the fact that the ELCA Conference of Bishops recently issued a statement about the need to speak the truth, rather than normalize lies and deceit: ELCA Conference of Bishops Analyzes Churchgoing Trends in Planning for Future – ELCA.